Green New Deal, “Earth Charter”, Greta Thunberg and Climate Change
Climate change includes both the global warming driven by human emissions of greenhouse gases, and the resulting large-scale shifts in weather patterns. Though there have been previous periods of climatic change, since the mid-20th century, humans have had an unprecedented impact on Earth’s climate system and caused change on a global scale.
The largest driver of warming is the emission of greenhouse gases, of which more than 90% are carbon dioxide (CO
2) and methane. Fossil fuel burning (coal, oil, and gas) for energy consumption is the main source of these emissions, with additional contributions from agriculture, deforestation, and industrial processes. The human cause of climate change is not disputed by any scientific body of national or international standing. Temperature rise is accelerated or tempered by climate feedbacks, such as loss of sunlight-reflecting snow and ice cover, increased water vapour (a greenhouse gas itself), and changes to land and ocean carbon sinks.
But not to bore you with high school geography, there is another hidden answer that is usually behind the scenes when it comes to shit they teach you at school. It seems the media in the past few years as well as key politicians (or both ‘Al blood briefcase Gore’) are obsessed with climate change as it is commonly mentioned by them. I don’t know could this maybe all be part of a United Nations power tool? It’s a sure way to get votes and pull people on your side, manipulate people to invest in products or ideas and if they don’t want to take part they condemn and guilt trip you “oh you don’t care about the environment”.
Green New Deal
As mentioned a couple of weeks ago regarding the ‘Great Reset’, it included a large involvement regarding different leaders’ approach with a Green New Deal to achieve sustainable bullshit goals.
Refer to fargery regarding 2018 democrats adoption: (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_New_Deal)
As mentioned a couple of months ago, the sunrise movement appears as a front for a global activist group, where in reality it is another arm of the diverse ‘Antifa Octopus’, which if you don’t know by now it is a party funded by George Soros that aims at different types of diverse groups but at the end they all have one same agenda, which is to start riots and cause a fargery, so staged actors pretty much, and the sunrise movement is the tentacle aimed at climate change, as well as all of hollywood also.
Speaking of Antifa funded climate change activist, enter Greta Thunberg the teenager with a dream, that dream is to not be one of the tortured victims at the Davos meeting, but the torturer. YES, at the age of 16 she attended Klaus Schwub’s holiday retreat and had a nice chat with Prince Charles (luckily not his brother) but let’s not jump the gun. First things first, where did this bitch come from?
16-year-old climate change activist Greta Thunberg has quickly risen to become one of the world’s most prominent political leaders, inspiring a mass movement of millions seemingly out of thin air to combat the problem of global warming.
However, the young girl’s sudden ascent to prominence is not happening by chance. She has deep connections to the globalist elite and activist parents who are supporters of the far-left domestic terrorist group ANTIFA. Thunberg’s frequent handler is Luisa-Marie Neubauer, an operative from the ONE Movement. Neubauer can be seen behind Thunberg at many of her public events.
ONE originated in conversations between Bill Gates and Bono in the early 2000s about the need to better inform Americans about extreme poverty around the world. Together with Melinda Gates, Bobby Shriver, George Soros, Ed Scott, Bob Geldof, and Jamie Drummond, they created an anti-poverty advocacy organization called DATA that focused on deploying celebrities and other influential individuals to urge world leaders to take action on specific development issues. Within a few years, DATA had joined with several other organizations to form ONE, with major backing from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. It takes funding from a who’s who of left wing foundations, including Gates, Bono, Bloomberg, Google and William & Flora Hewlett. Not to mention, of course, George Soros’ Open Society Foundation.
The Paris Accord is an agreement within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), dealing with greenhouse-gas-emissions mitigation, adaptation, and finance, signed in 2016. The agreement’s language was negotiated by representatives of 196 state parties at the 21st Conference of the Parties of the UNFCCC in Le Bourget, near Paris, France, and adopted by consensus on 12 December 2015. As of December 2020, all 197 members of the UNFCCC have signed the agreement and 189 remain party to it. Of the eight countries which are not party to the law, the only significant emitters are Iran and the United States. Following the November 2020 election, President-Elect Joe Biden vowed to bring the United States back into the Paris Accord on his first day in office, as well as renewing America’s commitment to mitigating climate change.
So this UN based agreement seems like another way to get countries involved in a sort of Green New Deal mixed with a bit of Agenda 21 without calling it that. As mentioned, it does seem like the UN likes to dangle money over these countries to comply with things they want to agree on, which is why it makes people think, what is this UN, are they the New World Order or are they opening the door for that? But besides the point it is just another example of using the climate as the ploy for something else. There have been so many yearly summits with different nations where it is all recycled information they say each year, so why hasn’t anything been done?
Earth Charter proudly sponsored by Oscarmyer
In modern news Prince Frankfurt Fingers announced the other day an Earth Charter. Not sure why he has such a hard-on for this type of business, but I guess all that talk from Davos and Klaus Schwub gave him the idea. Now the purpose of this Earth Charter is a pioneering multi-national agreement between some of the biggest firms in the world to put sustainability at the heart of the global post-pandemic recovery and that it will bring prosperity into harmony with nature, people and planet over the next decade. Those that have signed up include Bank of America, AstraZeneca, Schroders, HSBC, Heathrow Airport, Coutts, BP and Sir Jony Ive, former chief design officer at Apple. The launch of Charles’ project comes as Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced the UK will spend at least £3 billion of its international funding for climate action on efforts to protect nature over the next five years.
What is Global Warming / Climate Change?
Most people lump Global warming and climate change together when they are in fact two different things. Global warming refers to the warming of the planet, a natural change that has taken place since the dawn of the planet.
Climate change encompasses global warming, but refers to the broader range of changes that it supposedly brings along with, this includes rising sea levels, melting ice caps / glaciers, ice melt in Greenland / Antarctica and shifts in the flower plant blooming times.
Is it really happening?
As coined by John Coleman, founder of the weather channel, when asked if he is concerned about global warming “I’m only concerned about the incredible frenzy and hype for something that’s a total myth”.
Governments have spent billions upon billions of dollars to combat something that isn’t real. Many scientists have come out and stated that global warming doesn’t exist in significance. Don’t get me wrong there are absolutely climate fluctuations but these are natural and have existed throughout time. Solar cycles change, ocean currents change and all this has an effect on climate. The existence of man (People) and cities has had an effect on climate but none if it is of any significance.
I promise you in my lifetime, the ocean’s will not flood the coast; we aren’t going to have global climate change that cuts off food supplies or eradicate hundreds of species of animals. All that is going to happen is the earth is going to change with the cycles of the sun as it has been doing.
IPCC (International Panel of Climate Change)
If you look at the history of the IPCC it was formed by people whose agendas were questionable. They are a globalist organisation. They wanted to get back at the industrialised nations and get them to essentially pay them back for the pollution of the atmosphere through their industrial activities. Look at the work of Alan Cheatham (an engineer), this UN panel (IPCC) exists to prove that there’s climate change, so what do they do? They hire scientists and give them research money to prove their point. Holds meetings, publicity meetings to build an image.
There was no consensus on the report. Many scientists who contributed can be deemed as political scientists meaning they have a political agenda they adhere to. There was no huge consensus amongst scientists who peer reviewed the research that carbon dioxide causes a significant change in climate. There is no consensus on climate change, the media is portraying one aside but readily dispel any notion of disagreement, and essentially shutting down one of the main cornerstones of science, debate. A group of scientists who were on the IPCC panel who shared the nobel peace prize with Al Gore, were saying that the group should disband and that the panel is infact a sham.
So you may be asking, what does cause these fluctuations in temperature since our carbon dioxide output isn’t of any significance?
Well there’s something known as a Modern Minimum and essentially it means the sun goes into a pseudo hibernation, what’s this mean? Well if the sun goes into a modern minimum it means the number of solar flares diminish and the sun lays quiet, The sun is a mass of 91% hydrogen combusting and exploding, it is not a uniform entity it is irregular in its existence, constantly changing. It is the source of the Earth’s energy per say, without it no plants will grow no life will flourish it is essentially all over without it. So if the sun’s intensity were to lessen what would you think will happen? The heat output will lessen and the temperature of the Earth will change accordingly. I think the sun is due for a Modern Minimum soon, During this modern grand minimum, one would expect to see a reduction of the average terrestrial temperature by up to 1.0 °C in the decade 2031 – 2043. (https://watchers.news/2020/09/02/zharkova-study-modern-grand-solar-minimum-2020-2053/)
Check out Valentina Zharkova’s research in this field, if you are interested in Modern minimum and predictions relating to it.
Look global warming is here . its not man made, infact we may be excited about an ice age . There is no doubt that we are polluting the planet , and I’m not against every effort being made to stop the pollution. But CO 2 does not cause warming . The sun heats this planet and all the planets , all the planets are heating up ALL the planets are heating up . We have not polluted the other planets. If and more probably when Valentina Zharkova is proven correct , there will be a pause in the warming and it will get shit kicking cold in the Northern Hemisphere, in the winter .
Something they use to demonstrate increase in temperature is something called an Urban Heat islands, and they are indeed a real occurrence. Basically if you have a thermometer in the city, the temperature will climb which is attributed to the lower amount of vegetation as well as the materials used to construct cities, these materials have thermal bulk properties that absorb more solar radiation than the surfaces found in rural areas. Additionally, these materials have different surface radiative properties, which means they emit energy as thermal radiation or heat.
However if you put the thermometer in the surrounding rural area there will be no increased temperature. There are a lot of inconsistencies surrounding temperature monitoring.
Carbon Dioxide, the biggest enemy to the Earth we live on. A natural component of the atmosphere that we exhale is considered a pollutant. The component that plants process to flourish is Carbon Dioxide but when our power plants & vehicles emit it, it is the enemy of mankind. Seems to me that they have an agenda against fossil fuels and this may be an agenda to phase them out. (Will go into why in the next section)
Why would they push this agenda?
The increasing political impact of the government on science. Taking a public stance on this may negatively affect grants.
Almost all political figures are for global warming, some even declaring global warming worse than the threat of terrorism. You could say they are just being influenced by polls or there could be a more sinister plan to the incredible hype pushed forward by the media.
For control: they can decide when you can use transportation
- They want to BAN any sales on fossil fuelled vehicles in some provinces by either 2025 or 2030. Most average people cannot afford an electric car, and that’s what they want they realize no one can afford battery powered cars, that’s part of the plan, once combustion engine cars are gone, they will pull the plug (pun intended) on battery powered cars as they are not ‘sustainable’
the combustion engine car is ‘freedom of movement’, the slaves have had that too long, the replacement is ‘transportation as a service’, preferably government transit through PPPs
, when you can eat meat, how much water and electricity you use; everything to justify taking control of nearly every facet of your daily life.