Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 36:29 — 66.8MB) | Embed
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Spotify | RSS
07/08/21
Episode 64
Cyber Polygon 2021 – The World Economic Forum Simulation
The World Economic Forum (WEF) will stage a ‘cyber attack exercise’ to prepare for a “potential cyber pandemic”, that founder Klaus Schwab says will be worse than the current crisis.
Cyber Polygon combines the world’s largest technical training for corporate teams and an online conference featuring senior officials from international organisations and leading corporations. Every year, the training brings together a wide range of global businesses and government structures, while the live stream gathers millions of spectators from across the world. This year, the event is taking a bit of a more serious tone, given uncertainties in the world.
According to the WEF, COVID-19 was known as an ‘anticipated risk’, and so is its digital equivalent. “A cyber attack with COVID-like characteristics would spread faster and farther than any biological virus. Its reproductive rate would be around 10 times greater than what we’ve experienced with the coronavirus.” — Klaus Schwab
We will have to wait until the forum begins to understand exactly what context this cyber attack is based on, or what the ‘anticipated’ results could potentially be, but we can make some assumptions. Of course, we have spoken of food systems breaking down due to COVID-19 restrictions (see Rockefeller’s Future Reset Forum) and also concepts contained in the (delayed) Great Reset forum. However, it seems while these are specific systems that may be encompassed in a massive cyber attack of ecosystems — food and economy — this forum will tackle the larger issue of a digital world. This will follow on from the 2020 Summit, in which they made the case for why having digital identities was actually necessary to prevent a cyber pandemic.
This year’s forum will discuss the cyber attack itself, which is the problem that will arise. So, if this is the case, what could this type of problem look like in an inter-connected, digital world? In 2015, one of the “fathers of the Internet”, Vint Cerf, caused a stir when he expressed concern that today’s digital world might be lost forever. If technology continues to outpace preservation or security tactics, the present could be disrupted and future citizens could be locked out of a digital world – plunged into a “digital dark age”.
“The key message voiced by experts at WEF and other international platforms is that supply chain security is to become a major cybersecurity issue in 2021,” Sberbank stated. “The ever-expanding digitalization tightens the interconnectivity between people, devices, companies and countries. Thus, the resilience of an entire system depends on the ability of each link within a chain to withstand threats of various grades.”
The website ominously warns that “a single vulnerable link is enough to bring down the entire system, just like the domino effect”, adding that “Cyber Polygon 2021 will enable the spectators and participants to improve on their cyber literacy, enhance the resilience of their organizations and learn to repel cyberthreats on all levels.”
Cyber Polygon 2021 is the annual continuation of last year’s Cyber Polygon 2020 event, which included Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin, and participants like WEF founder Klaus Schwab, former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, and about 20 other members of the political elite. Notably, one of the presenters was Stéphane Duguin, CEO of the CyberPeace Institute, which is funded by Microsoft, Facebook and Mastercard, among others. The institute claims to help customers “increase digital resilience and the capacity to respond to and recover from cyberattacks.”
“Some will say that a ‘cyberpandemic’ is an inevitable consequence of the quickly developing hi-tech world in which we live, but it still fair to point out that 2021 is the year that many have been predicting for the financial destruction of big institutions that will lead to new economic systems that align with the Great Reset,”
“The inevitable collapse of the global banking system, resulting from the off-the-charts corruption and fraud that has run rampant for decades, is likely to be conducted through a controlled collapse, one that would allow wealthy bankers and elites, such as those that participated in Cyber Polygon, to avoid responsibility for their economic pillaging and criminal activity.”
“When the world’s most powerful people, such as members of the WEF, desire to make radical changes, crises conveniently emerge—whether a war, a plague, or economic collapse—that enable a “reset” of the system, which is frequently accompanied by a massive upward transfer of wealth.”
Cyber Polygon 2021 concludes with discussions paving a path towards a greater centralization of power and surveillance that furthers the great reset agenda of the global economy and all societal structures.The World Economic Forum (WEF) and partners’ annual Cyber Polygon cybersecurity training exercise concluded on July 9 with several key trends emerging that are likely to shape global policymaking for years to come.
These trends include:
-A desire to immunize the internet with digital antibodies to ‘protect’ society from cyberattacks and misinformation by exploiting ransomware attacks and a public health crisis to justify the centralization of power and control.
-A demonization of cryptocurrencies in favor of central bank digital currencies where all transactions are recorded on a centralized ledger and have the ability to grant permissions on purchases, which further consolidates power.
-A closer merger of corporation and state as the solution to any given crisis, be it cybersecurity, climate change, or COVID-19, without ever being put to a vote by the will of the people.
Discussions coming out of Cyber Polygon 2021 concluded with the desire to immunize the internet, demonize cryptocurrencies, and prop-up centralized systems of governance through a closer merger of corporations and states (public-private partnerships). The public-private solutions presented suggest that the WEF and partners are leading society down a path towards a greater centralization of power and surveillance that furthers the great reset agenda.
According to Schwab:
“We have to protect ourselves not only against the virus, we also have to develop the ability to withstand a virus attack. “In other words, masks are not sufficient. We need vaccines to immunize ourselves. “The same is true for cyberattacks. Here, too, we have to move from simple protection to immunization. “We need to build IT infrastructures that have digital antibodies built-in inherently to protect themselves.”
According to one WEF report, “A war on cybercrime could easily become a war on Internet freedom,” and the solution could lie in “developing and disseminating countermeasures as threats emerge, or, in other words, building a digital immune system for the Internet.” Immunizing the internet with digital antibodies, according to Schwab’s latest speech, requires public-private collaborations. Where governments are limited in their knowledge and power, corporations can sweep in to fill the void.
The World Economic Forum and partners do not like decentralized cryptocurrencies. Instead, the unelected bureaucrats prefer the centralization and consolidation of power that Central Bank Digital Currencies can provide. Therefore, WEF members will take any opportunity to demonize decentralized cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. At Cyber Polygon 2021, the globalists took aim at the “Ransomware as a Service” business model as a means to target cryptocurrencies more broadly.
Another Cyber Polygon 2021 discussion panel had a rather peculiar title: “New World — New Currency,” which elaborated on how central banks were looking to implement digital currencies where all transactions would be recorded on a single ledger. The panel highlighted central bank efforts to roll out digital currencies that can be programmed with permissions on transactions, with the ability to restrict certain purchases. For example, imagine that you are able to give your kids some money in digital dollars and then restrict their use to purchase junk food.
So, to recap so far: immunizing the internet means eradicating ransomware and other threats, and part of eradicating ransomware means demonizing cryptocurrencies while pushing for fully centralized and permission-based Central Bank Digital Currencies.
Generally speaking, all proposed solutions lead towards giving public and private entities more power to surveil, control, coerce, and exert influence over all digital activity through the merger of corporations and states (public-private partnerships). And with the WEF’s great reset agenda pushing for the merger of our physical, digital, and biological selves through the Internet of Bodies (IoB) ecosystem, what we are seeing is a future where the human body is physically connected to the internet at all times — thus making human beings themselves vulnerable to cyber attacks.
Today, we are seeing European countries like France mandating digital COVID health passes and vaccine passports for citizens to participate in “non-essential” daily activities such as going to restaurants and sporting events. France will soon begin charging people for PCR tests as a means to coerce individuals into getting the vaccine and then signing up for the health passport, which threatens fundamental human rights on many levels.
According to Politico, “Biden allied groups, including the Democratic National Committee, are also planning to engage fact-checkers more aggressively and work with SMS carriers to dispel misinformation about vaccines that is sent over social media and text messages.”
On the digital identity front, Tony Blair said at last year’s Cyber Polygon, “Digital ID for me is a very big part of the future.” “Inevitably, governments are going to move in this direction — absolutely, inevitably,” he added.
ELITE’S NEAR-FUTURE GAME PLAN DISMANTLE THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL SYSTEM
-The end goal is total control achieved by fusing central banks, financial regulatory agencies, tech
giants, and the national security state by first reconfiguring the finance industry as a template for
the reengineering of other industries.
-In July 2019, Carnegie Endowment gathered leading experts in government, banking, industry,
and technology to develop an international cybersecurity strategy for the financial sector.
-Carnegie is regularly ranked as one of the top think tanks in the world, and its president for the
past seven years, William Burns, was appointed Director of the CIA in March 2021.
-Echoing a widespread concern of world leaders, in November 2020, Carnegie and WEF produced
an influential report warning that the global financial system is highly vulnerable to cyber attacks.
-The report recommended social media monopolies work with banks to coordinate censorship. It
also encouraged cooperation between banks and law enforcement (e.g, Bank of America turned
over credit card records of January 6 Capitol protesters to the FBI).
-Crashing the monetary system with a cyber attack is the perfect scenario to put a nail in the
coffin on a dying fiat currency system. The replacement is a cashless society based on the China
model of a digital social credit system.
-A controlled demolition of the global banking system would need to eliminate black markets,
while ensuring central banks and wealthy elites escape blame and punishment for decades of
obscene corruption, rampant pillaging, and criminal activity.
https://intelligence.weforum.org/topics/a1G0X000006DR3hUAG?tab=publications
Different strategies to deal with COVID-19
- World Bank (The World Bank is an international financial institution that provides loans and grants to the governments of low- and middle-income countries.) sold “World Pandemic Bonds” ($500m in bonds, oversubscribed by 200%. Plan references “derivatives & complex financial instruments” so it may have been more.)
2. World Bank partnered with World Health Organization 6 months later.
3. The prospectus has fine print of certain conditions in which the bonds would not pay out.
Original link (since removed): http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/882831509568634367/PEF-Final-Prospectus-PEF.pdf
It’s still in Archive.org: https://web.archive.org/web/20180614050123/http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/882831509568634367/PEF-Final-Prospectus-PEF.pdf
4. Five US governors and leaders in other countries put recovering Covid-19 patients into nursing homes. Some disallowed nursing homes from testing incoming patients for Covid-19 (!)
https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CHCQ/LCP/Pages/AFL-20-33.aspx
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/a-timeline-of-the-cuomo-nursing-home-controversy
5. With the deaths increasing and now hitting the conditions in the prospectus — World Bank was able to keep the money, which was then distributed globally to key players in this global operation. The pandemic was declared about a month before the deadline that would have returned investors money.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/18/coronavirus-world-bank-pandemic-bond-investors-face-big-losses.html
6. SPECULATION: There was limited controversy surrounding the failing of these bonds because the major stakeholders may have been organizations who would profit from the pandemic.
tl;dr: This may have been the money laundering scheme that financed this global operation.
I’m wondering if it’s a way to mask who was involved with funding this crisis. The elites are well known for moving money discreetly through charity and non-profits. Maybe this was another form of that.
it’s hard to find info on who bought these bonds but it appears that pensions and retirement funds bought much of it. (!)
So they may have used *our money* to finance this operation against us. (!)
If the fund managers purchased these funds — there is no way to justify what they did. The powers that be made sure we were well aware of all the severe flus, MERS, SARS, etc. leading up to this. The same people WARNED something like this would happen.
So how could the people warning it would happen then sell a bond that doesn’t return money to the investors if it happens?!
I believe there may be something here – but we need someone with more time and money to investigate this thoroughly. Sadly, anyone who has time or money is working for a lockdown profiteer so that’s not going to happen.